C# IEnumerable Kullanımı - Genel Bakış

C# IEnumerable Kullanımı - Genel Bakış

Blog Article

If your class is a custom collection class then yes, it should implement IEnumerable. In this case a public property for the inner list would be redundant. Imagine a simple class:

Sevimli a unique position be deduced if pieces are replaced by checkers (hayat see piece color but derece type)

Lütfen süflidaki kutuya şikayetinizin bilgilerinı yazın. Şikayetinizi değerlendirildikten sonra size haber vereceğiz.

IEnumerable execute a select query on the server side, load data in-memory on a client-side and then filter data

Although there are uses of IEnumerable other than "foreach", the düzgülü indication that one should implement IEnumerable is that the class is one where it would make sense to say "foreach foo in classItem foo.do_something(); .

I noticed that if I use "Distinct", the "inner" contains 6 items (this is incorrect bey only 2 are Distinct), but the "outer" does contain the correct values. Again, probably the delegated methods determine this but this is a bit more than I know about IEnumerable.

Ryan LundyRyan Lundy 208k4141 gold badges183183 silver badges214214 bronze badges 3 4 Then why do we need this IEnumerable abstraction, if the only thing it does is just provide an access to Enumerator? Why don't just use Enumerator instead

IEnumerable gives you the way to implement your own logic of storing and iterating over object collection

) without affecting original veri." is confusing. Do you mean that the new list returned emanet been added to, and elements can be removed but no updates? C# IStructuralComparable Kullanımı I thought that because it returned ienumerable you dirilik modify the elements in the list, i.e. change a property like you said but you birey't add and remove items in the list. Is that correct?

Marc GravellMarc Gravell 1.0m271271 gold badges2.6k2.6k silver badges2.9k2.9k bronze badges 1 C# IStructuralComparable Nasıl kullanılır 1 The mistake with "Reset" was with just having one type of enumerable. IMHO, there should C# IStructuralComparable Temel Özellikleri have been an IMultipassEnumerable, inheriting IEnumerable, which would support Reset C# IStructuralComparable Temel Özellikleri and guarantee that multiple passes will either return identical veri or throw an exception; an ordinary IEnumerable whose collection was modified should be allowed to return 'sensible' veri if it's able to do so or throw an exception if it sevimli't, and an ISafeEnumerable, which would be expected to work sensibly (without throwing an exception) even if a collection changes. A bit late now to change things, though.

What US checks and balances prevent the FBI from raiding politicians unfavorable to the federal government?

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one sıkıntı only by editing this post.

Bu interface, uygulandığı sınıfa GetEnumerator adlı bir metot kazanmıştırrır ve bu metot geriye IEnumerator interface’ini implement eden bir sınıf döndürür.

The most important thing to realize is that, using Linq, the query does not get evaluated immediately. It is only run kakım part of iterating through the resulting IEnumerable in a foreach - that's what all the weird delegates C# IStructuralComparable nerelerde kullanılıyor are doing.